End-to-End Design, Cross-functional leadership

Transforming the header of Nuts.com and improving overall site conversation

Collaborated with

Product Manager, Front-end Developers, E-commerce Manager, Creative Director

ROLE

Sole Product Designer

Year

2023 & 2024

Timeline

5 months - Phase 1

Impact Summary

+0.89%

Conversion rate uplift - phase 1

+2.30%

Conversion rate uplift - phase 2

+1%

AOV uplift

Improved Clarity

For site navigation experience

Boost Confidence

In cross-functional collaboration

Built the Foundation

For future business growth

The Business Problem

Business goal: grow the business & expand the customer base

Nuts.com is a direct-to-consumer company that sells premium, high-quality snacks. As part of the growth strategy, the business wanted to expand to younger demographics who care deeply about brand experience

The solution: site modernization

The challenge was that an outdated site signals low quality, regardless of how good the products actually are. The company needed to elevate their brand through a modern site experience

The site header was mission critical:

🌟

It defines the look & feel of the entire site

🌟

98% of the new customers use it to explore categories & find what they need

🌟

Important to returning customers to explore categories & reorder

My Challenge: From Simple "UI Refresh" to Strategic Design

Leadership asked for a "modern refresh" with a tight timeline. But I saw a risk and proposed a discovery research plan

I've noticed deeper issues—confusing categorization, unclear hierarchy—and I was concerned that changing the navigation without understanding how customers used it could actually hurt conversions, so I proposed start with discovery research, learning what exactly went wrong with the header.

Striking discovery: 43% of the participants gave up because they couldn't find products during user testing

During the discovery research, turns out the usability issues were more striking than I thought. Here are the main issues that I found using the research:

Identified missing business opportunities that can unlock more growth

Not only the usability issue was more severe than we thought, my PM and I also found a bunch of missed business opportunities that hinders growth - Search missing autocomplete & history, Cart & Reorder links were buried, and inflexibility for the business's growth needs

Key Design Changes with Phased Rollout Plan

Since the header redesign consisted of a lot of changes and required decent amount of cross-functional work, my PM and I broke the project down into different phases so that we were able to:

  1. Measure the impact of each major change effectively and iterate quickly when A/B testing showed a negative trend on the metrics

  2. Ship impactful results while working with the limitations each cross-functional team had

Phase #1.1

Clean up the visual hierarchy + improving navigation scannability (Shipped)

In this round of the A/B testing, we saw a 0.89% overall conversion uplift.

Before
After
Phase #1.2

Search functionalities optimization - auto-complete, search history, and category recommendations (Shipped on Mobile)

For mobile experience specifically, the conversion rate was up by 1.73%

Before
After
Phase #2

Optimized the high converting utility links + consolidated categories (Live )

The goal for this phase was to isolate the changes that affecting return customers experience, so we can measure the impact clearly. During phase 2 testing, we saw a 1.00% uplift in AOV, increasing traffic to the reorder page, and meaningful improvement on bounce rate.

So…How I Got Here

Based on the business goals, usability issues that I learned, and the patterns that I saw on other sites that have large product catalog, I broke the header into 2 parts and started my design exploration:

  1. Utilities - Search, Reorder, Cart etc (Collaborated with Engineering team)

  2. Navigation IA - Category Structures (Collaborated with Merchandising team)

Finally, I narrowed down to three directions and discussed the pros and cons with my team and stakeholders.

Design Explorations

After discussing the designs with Engineering and the Merchandising teams, there are a few limitations emerged:

Limitation 1: Search - due to the set up of backend tool that powers the search suggestions, a few features that I proposed was not feasible unless we clean up the product tags

Limitation 2: Navigation IA - merchandising team didn't have the resources to do a full revamp for the category structure within the timeline

The solution: A phased rollout plan

Risk Mitigation Through Testing

Since the header redesign touched on so many parts, I conducted different tests to make sure that we:

  1. Mitigate the risk and understand what changes made impact

  2. Build confidence in stakeholders

Navigating Through Feedbacks & Changes

Although during the user testings, the overall feedbacks from participants were positive, when we ran the A/B testing live, a few issues emerged

Unexpected Challenges

😩

Challenge

🧐

Investigation

🔨

Iteration

😀

Result

Challenge 1: Conversion drop during A/B testing

😩 Challenge 1: Conversion drop during A/B testing

Launched a survey and found a critical bug in the implementation

🧐 Launched a survey and found a critical bug in the implementation

Collaborated with developers and fixed the issue

🔨 Collaborated with developers and fixed the issue

Conversion rate recovered

😀 Conversion rate recovered

Challenge 2: B2B Leads Drop-off

😩 Challenge 2: B2B Leads Drop-off

Collaborated with stakeholders and PM to make a strategic plan

🧐 Collaborated with stakeholders and PM to make a strategic plan

Came up with a intermediate solution that balance the current and future business needs

🔨 Came up with a solution that balance the current and future business needs

Leads sign-up rate recovered

😀 Leads sign-up rate recovered

Reflection & Learnings

This is a first large scale project that I led at Nuts that encompass end-to-end design, project management, strategy, and cross-functional collaborations. I learned a lot during the process and here are some of the biggest learnings:

Isolate changes for testing impact on specific metrics

When data tracking and analytics capability is limited, it's better to isolate changes for the test in order to get a more accurate learnings on how the changes impact a specific business metric.

The header navigation redesign was a project that touched on many facets of the business, including DTC customer acquisition, retention, and B2B, and different design changes had different impacts. For my next project at this scale, I would design with all the metrics in mind but then work with my PM to break the test into focus areas so that we can better gauge design impact based on business metrics

Scope all dependencies early on

One of the things that I did well for this project was to present the ideas early on to the cross-functional team to gain strategy alignment, but there were still some dependencies that I missed, for example the B2B lead landing page entry point. So for my next project, during the project scoping process, I'd pay more attention to the dependencies that would be impacted by the design changes and work with the stakeholders on a plan to mitigate the risk.